In our own Interest Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

In our receive Interest - Essay ExampleDuring the case of Somalia, 19 Americans died while attempting to restore peace (Thompson et al 4). next the Mogadishu case, President Clintons intervention was restricted by the presidential term, condescension the fact that the passports offered went against their humanistic conscience. The recommendation entailed the evacuation of all the American people at Rwanda, save not rescuing any Rwandans despite the fact that they perfectly understood the crisis at Rwanda. This paper reviews the response of President Clinton and his staff during the Rwanda Genocide, towards demonstrating the evils that emanate from respectfulness and the influence of authority on human behavior. Discussion Following the orders from the American governing, during and after the start of the Rwandan crisis, the administrations advisors and the planning teams of the US through president Clinton and his staffs communicated a number of excuses for failing to act in response to the genocide (Thompson, et al. 2 Carroll). The reasons given by President Clinton and his staffs include that the true magnitude and the outperform of the killings taking place at Rwanda was not known. They also claimed that the rate of killings did not warrant the response of the US government (Thompson, et al. 3). However, considering that the massacre continued for a period of three months, it was clear that the inaction of President Clinton and his administration was not caused by the lack of proper information. Further, it became clear that the US was aware that the plans of the attack were known, because it was reported to the US, but nothing was done about the situation. The inaction of the US was also, not because it did not have enough resources, development which to respond to the situation. The reasons behind the failure of the inaction were primarily policy issues (DIA). The President and his staffs inaction are ostensible from the fact that they were wel l aware of the case, eve before it happened. This was evident from the fact that, on 11th of January 1994 common Dellaire informed the UN of planned assassinations of Tutsi officials (Carroll). His subsequent appeals for reinforcement were not served. Further, after the start of the killings, memoranda about killings were displace to the Secretary of Defenses office, and leading news papers like the Washington post and the saucy York Times reported the killings taking place (DIA). The policy recommendations that went against the conscience of President Clinton and his staffs included those from the administration that multitude force was not to be employed, following the experience that the US government had gained from the 3rd of October 1993 raid at Mogadishu, which ended with the killing of 19 Americans (Samantha 378). Other policy recommendations advanced by the US administration included that the interests of the US had to be protected, the administration did not have any a llocation to address the situation and that it lacked confederative and public support (Samantha 378). These administrative policy recommendations tied the president and his staffs ability to try in favor of the crisis at Rwanda. This case shows the effects of their obedience because the case culminated in the killing of much than 500,000 people (OToole Stanley). The president and h